Nexar or no nexa?

Nexa is said to occur when the work and ideas of people who have had no contact with each other are linked in some fundamental manner.

as little understood as lightning's role in the creation of Earth's atmosphere,

is it possible that nexa is an element inherent to the transmission of culture?


In the instant that we see a star all of its being: components, experience, intensity are contained in that transmission of light, even though the human eye isn't sensitive in all the star's wavelengths and the mind without tools can't decode all of the information that is nevertheless all there.

Nexa is commanly used as a noun, as if it is something that only happens to humans. With our experiential selves nexa operating independently of time as it seems to do is inexplicable and therefore apparently the product of an outside force

Nexar is defined here as a verb: to link, meaning less being struck by lightening than striking out to articulate a connection.

Suppose the creation of links (deeply related to pattern perception) is a function of the nervous system sensitive outside of linear comprehension?

Nexa can be thought of as an element of human tool-making at work under the surface of (time-based) consciousness to mediate environment as in the invention of languages, dreaming, or singing the resonances which articulate life outside of time
This effort seeks nexa between two powerful revolutionaries active in the early 20th Century.


Looking into the work of James Joyce and Albert Einstein what evidence of contiguity is there?
If nexa were based upon contemporaneity, intellectual excellence or courage then surely evidence could be found for shared ideas between these two such forward-thinking people.
Other people have thought about this.

I will offer information and see if lightning strikes.


The Portrait of a Scientist
as an Artist

<>

The Diagram of an Artist
as a Scientist

If no nexa is evident it could be because:

Comments to Kasey Rios Asberry<> Return to Human Origins